Former CIA Whistleblower Kevin Shipp on the ‘Ingram Angle’ on Monday, dropped a jaw when he said the Partisan CIA “Leaker” Is No “Whistleblower” and Is Connected to Obama.

Kevin Shipp: If you read the statement it’s based on absolutely nothing but hearsay and terrible accusations against the President of the United States that are not substantiated by anything.

Related; A Day After Pelosi’s Push For Trumps Impeachment, Damning Video Revealed, Opens Up Her Clinton’s Closet

In the statement, the so-called whistleblower, says 12 times that he had no direct evidence to what he was saying and 18 times that he overheard the evidence from “several US government officials” never mentioning their name or their identities at all.

And, as you know, if this was a court case based on hearsay the judge would throw it out. Also if we examine the whistleblower’s statements it’s pretty clear to me it was not written by the whistleblower…

Laura Ingraham: I want to go back to the Obama connection. Why do you think the connection must go back to Obama. Because why?

Kevin Shipp: Well, for example, this whistleblower was detailed to the White House with access to these transcripts, presidential transcripts. And he was detailed by the then Director of the CIA, John Brennan, who we know was at the center of the soft coup against the President of the United States. So that in itself needs to be looked into.

To weigh in, leave your comment below…